Skip to content
Pitt Rivers Museum

1914.28.5

Padded protective helmet made of cotton, filled with kapok, finished with blue cotton trim and adorned with five tassels.


1914.28.5

Digital asset copyright: Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford

Terms and Conditions

If you wish to order a high-resolution image and/or licence its use for print or web publication, exhibition, film, promotional product or any other use, whether in the academic or commercial sector of any print run, then please visit photographic services.

Collection type
Object
Description
Padded protective helmet made of cotton, filled with kapok, finished with blue cotton trim and adorned with five tassels.
Long description
Padded protective helmet/head-gear made of paisley printed and plain cotton, filled with kapok, finished with blue cotton trim, braiding and tassels. Quilted helmet made of natural coloured cotton dammur cloth combined with combined with printed cotton featuring paisley and floral motifs. Constructed from three pieces, a quilted circular crown, a quilted side panel forming the circumference, and a stiffened lower band that functions as a neck guard with two triangular cheek flaps for facial protection. Its edges are finished with dark blue cotton and it is embellished with five braids in yellow, white and cream, which culminate in six tassels. Filled with kapok and quilted with handstitched yellow thread to produce a thick protective structure. The crown and lower neck guard are lined in red cotton, while the central band is lined in blue. combined with printed cotton featuring paisley and floral motifs. Thought to have been worn by a member of the Mahdist or Khalifa's cavalry as an under-helmet to sit underneath a metal helmet.
Person
Field collector Donald Gunn
PRM source Donald Gunn
Date / Period
Date made: Before 1914
Date collected
By 1914
Acquisition information
Donated: 1914
Materials and processes
Process Padded, Material Cotton Seed Fibre Textile Plant, Material Kapok Seed Fibre Plant, Process Quilted, Process Stitched, Process Printed, Process Dyed, Process Woven
Object numbers
Accession number: 1914.28.5
Research and responses

Those individuals commonly spoken of as ‘Dervishes’ in the context of the Sudan of the late 19th century only loosely relate to the Persian term darwish in its proper sense – connoting a mendicant ascetic from any part of the Islamic world. Like many Islamic countries, the Sudan contains a number of active tariqa – sufi religious orders or brotherhoods in search of mystical enlightenment, nucleated around a teacher or chain of teachers. These teachers ultimately can claim some decent from the Prophet himself or one of the early Caliphs. The participants in the Mahdist movement are now conventionally spoken of as Ansar rather than Dervishes. The Mahdist movement was named after Mohammed Ahmad, known as El Mahdi (d.1885), who was himself originally a member of the Sammaniyya tariqa. However, following conflict with the order’s leader, he left the order and established his own movement, which rapidly grew to be the largest politico-religious movement of the Sudan. It was both a secular revolutionary movement, inspired by hatred of the colonial rule of the Ottomans since the 1820s, and an attempt to purify Sudanese Islam into a more orthodox form, and institute sharia law. El Mahdi declared a jihad on the Ottomans, and seized power in 1881. He was only to live another four years. In 1882, Egypt came under British rule due to British desires to secure control of the Suez Canal. Rule of the Sudan came with it. In 1885, El Mahdi died and was succeeded by one of his four deputies, the Khalifa Abdullahi, who led the movement until its defeat and destruction at the Battle of Omdurman in 1898. He was killed shortly after in the same year. The Battle of Omdurman (September 2nd, 1898) is one of the most poignant and mismatched battles ever fought. A combined army of Sudanese, Egyptian and British forces, number 25,800 men, under the command of General Sir Horatio Kitchener, met with the Mahdist army under the command of Khalifa Abdullahi. The Mahdist army taking the field that day was the single largest military force mobilised in Africa since the Crusades – in excess of 52,000 men - armed with a few thousand rifles, but in the main, spears, swords and daggers. They were predominantly armoured in cotton jibbah, supplemented by a minority of metallic armours. The Anglo-Egyptian-Sudanese force was significantly smaller in numbers, but had Maxim machine guns in their first major deployment, as well as gunboats in the Nile providing covering artillery fire. Early in the battle, the Mahdists employed a traditional tactic of a mass charge in tight formation, committing 16,000 men to this manoeuvre, which sent them into the muzzles of the Maxim guns. 4,000 men died outright in this first charge, and not one came within 50m of the Anglo-Sudanese line. This early part of Omdurman was described by one British officer present as “Not a battle, but an extermination”. At the end of the Battle of Omdurman, British dead numbered 48, and wounded 434. Mahdist dead numbered 9,700, and wounded 13,000. This battle served as the horrific proof of the senselessness of open-field tactical manoeuvres on a battlefield covered by long-range machine guns and artillery – a lesson which ultimately led to the trench warfare of Word War One sixteen years later.

Relevant Reading: Willis, C.A. (1921) Religious Confraternities of the Sudan. In: Sudan Notes & Records, Vol.4, pp.175-194. Aglen, E.F. (1937) Sheikan Battlefield. In: Sudan Notes & Records, Vol.20, pp.137-45. Mohammed, A.E.A. (1980) Militarism in the Sudan: The Colonial Experience. In: Sudan Notes & Records, Vol.59, pp.15-26.

Research Conducted for DCF Cutting Edge Project 2006/2007 [AM]

Search terms: Clothing Headgear, Insignia, Clothing Textile, Textile, Armour Weapon, Clothing, Religion, Hat, Helmet, Religious Object, Headgear, Armour